To be sure, an army of Ken Littleton apologists are protecting the person who is responsible for the murder of Martha Moxley, but their extreme tactics that are obviously politically motivated in a rather perverse way, are ultimately betrayed by the force of the nonsense they promote. For example, consider the absolute frivolity of the arguments/nonsense that Ken Littleton's apologists routinely promote. In particular, they invariably and routinely promote nonsense like:

"The Sutton Report gives clear, repeated and profoundly compelling reasons why Ken Littleton did not kill Martha Moxley and why, in my opinion, Michael Skakel did. No one has sever explained to me, with any creedence, what motive Ken Littleton had in killing a person he did't know, never met, on his first night in a strange neighborhood, and with his whole future ahead of him. I'm sorry, but "looking for a home to park his penis' doesn't cut it for me."

If Ken Lettleton did not have a legion of well funded apologists who routinely promote the same, silly barrage of nonsense, the campaign to create the false impression that a murderer like Ken Littleton is a victim, would not exist. The truth has finally caught up with Ken Littleton. In the first place, Ken Littleton is a bipolar disorder sufferer, and the fact that he was an undiagnosed, bipolar sufferer on the night that he murderer Martha Moxley does not negate the fact that crazy people like Ken Littleton do not need a motive to murder. In the second place, the Sutton Associates report clerly indicates that Ken Littleton asked Michael Skakel about Martha Moxley and the suggestion that he did not know her reflects the obsession to manufacture a much needed alibi that does not exist. In the third place, the fact that Ken Littleton spent his first night on the job in a strange neighborhood is the sort of environment that bipolar sufferers have difficulty adjusting to, and that is why it took somebody like Ken Littleton, who was unable to cope with his new surroundings, to unleash the brutal horrific, unexpected assault that lead to the murder of Martha Moxley. In the fourth place, the obsession to discredit a world renowned, competent investigator like David Sween, for stating the obvious, is too bizarre to take seriously. Ken Littleton was a young jock who expected sex from his female acquaintances, and Martha Moxley was a friendly flirt who was invariably positioned to confuse a bipolar sufferer like Ken Litleton. To be sure, when David Sween said that Ken Littleton was "looking for a home to park his penis" it was not the best choice of words, but Littleton wasted an entire life doing no more and no less. It is an act of desperation to challenge Sween's compelling assertion that Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley, simply because seasoned investigators like David Sween have not attended the finest schools. Indeed, David Sween has accurately portrayed Ken Littleton, a career criminal who has wasted his entire, and it is the suggestion that Ken Littleton had his whole future ahead of him which is absolutely preposterous, because Ken Littleton wasted his "entire future".

In the final analysis, investigator, David Sween has clearly proved that Ken Littleton is a murderer, by proving that all the alternative "excuses" that they use to defend Littleton are absolutely preposterous. By the way sports fans, Mark Fuhrman, the crackpot Detective who routinely perverts justice was planning to write 'Murder in Modesto'. Anybody know what's taking so long? Has David Sween thwarted the conspiracy to frame Scott Peterson?

The people who murdered Laci Peterson thought that they could rely on a scapegoat like Amber Frey to frame Scott Peterson. Amber Frey is not a victim. She is a pawn of the conspiracy to frame Scott, by using a rag like the National Enquirer to make the case. http://nationalenquirer.alturl.com