Understanding the bizarre plots to frame Michael Jackson and Scott Peterson.

640  Date: 2003-11-25 05:07:25
Ron Moschetti ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

I was watching Larry King. What a joke. Diane Dimond and Nancy Grace are claiming that Michael Jackson used his henchmen to steal love letters? Why weren't the burglars arrested? What a bunch of ignorant MORONS. Bust out with laughter every time Diane Dimond brags about her top level, law enforcement contacts. Does she lunch with Ashcroft?

639  Date: 2003-11-25 02:41:41
David Sween ( no email / http://message.alturl.com) wrote:

A bunch of complaints by a bunch of lunatics does not make a pending, criminal case against Michael Jackson. It discredits the administration of justice.


638  Date: 2003-11-25 02:27:53
Lynne Foster ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

According to the speculative standards of proof that Nancy Grace and Diane Dimond promote, Michael Jackson is a child molester who hired private investigators to destroy evidence [love letters] and George Bush is a rapist who arranged the death of complainants like Margie Schoedinger.

If Michael Jackson had ordered a break in, I think he would have been in jail a very long time ago.

637  Date: 2003-11-25 02:06:37
Beth Wilson ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

The dead body of a credible source is far more newsworthy than Michael Jackson's phantom love letters.

636  Date: 2003-11-25 01:58:38
Jessie Duplantis ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Margie Schoedinger was a credible complainant. The media had between December 2nd 2002 and September 22 2003, to prove that Margie Schoedinger was a nutcase --it didn't happen. The fact is, Margie Schoedinger was impossible to discredit --that's why she is now dead.

635  Date: 2003-11-25 00:21:02
Where is the media? ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Regardless of what you or I might think of the charges leveled against Bush by Margie Schoedinger, it IS news.

Personally I found some of the stories of some of the people who accused President Clinton of rape or sexual misconduct quite dubious, yet the media reported on them.

During the Clinton administration the press seemed to convict him in the court of public opinion.

Here once again, the press is stepping outside of its place by not reporting on this story at all. The media has become useless and irrelevant because it merely destroys easy targets like Scott Peterson and Michael Jackson. The media does not investigate or even report serious crime.

634  Date: 2003-11-24 22:56:17
Good url ( no email / no homepage) wrote:


633  Date: 2003-11-24 22:51:42
Beth Wilson ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Very interesting. I don't think that anybody reasonable or intelligent thinks that Michael Jackson molested anybody. In fact, they are so unstable they cannot even file a credible complaint.

632  Date: 2003-11-24 22:25:11
Jesse Duplantis ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

In December of 2002, Margie Schoedinger was sane enough to submit all the required filing fees, to document the serious intent to be compensated for being a rape victim. The alleged assailant was George W. Bush. If the civil court documents
published on the Imternet regarding this case are authentic, then Margie Schoedinger was too unstable to file any complaint, but that does not appear to be the case and her demand for compensation was as clear and as specific as those who demanded compensation from Michael Jackson. Moreover, the fact that Margie Schoedinger dated George W. Bush when she was a minor has been confirmed by the police.

On September 22, 2003, Margie Schoedinger, the woman who filed a lawsuit against George W. Bush in December 2002, claiming that she had been raped, died of a gunshot wound to the head, registered officially as "suicide".

In my opinion, when we compare the lives of George W. Bush and Michael Jackson, rape allegations against George W. Bush are more credible than sexual molestation charges against Michael Jackson, and every good ol' boy understands that. Why doesn't doesn't Nancy Grace, Gloria Allred and Diane Dimond understand the need to protect victims like Margie Schoedinger?

631  Date: 2003-11-24 15:14:21
Lynne Foster ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Larry Feldman, a civil attorney who'd served as head of the Los Angeles Trial Lawyers Association, urged Michael Jackson's latest, "molestation victim" to speak to a therapist. Why didn't Larry Feldman urge him to speak to the police? It sounds like Mr. Feldman has made a career out of targeting Michael Jackson, and the failure to formalize criminal charges is a personal embarrassment --or the tell-tale sign of an ambulance chaser who uses serious criminal allegations to pad a frivolous case. To be sure, the DA has emphatically emphasized the claim that this is about criminal behavior and not about civil law, but one would have to be an absolute imbecile to believe that.

630  Date: 2003-11-24 14:12:37
Barb Douglas ( barbdouglas@techie.com / no homepage) wrote:

Character ultimately triumphs. When incompetent or corrupt attorneys like Mickey Sherman and Gloria Allred allow perverse perceptions like the claims that a homicidal maniac like Ken Littleton and a whore like Amber Frey are innocent victims, they facilitate the opportunity to distort the truth and to obstruct justice.

Poor Mickey, he turned out to be a one trick pony. Michael Skakel, an absolutely innocent man, was convicted in his incompetent or dirty hands, and now, he doesn't have any clients. He could have been defending Scott Peterson and Michael Jackson.

629  Date: 2003-11-23 19:13:33
Laura Dougherty ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

How predictable. Conservative idealogue, Jonah Goldberg claims that the failure to condemn Michael Jackson [to insist that he is as guilty as OJ Simpson] is a reflection of the "death of outrage." The son of Nixon's treacherous spy, Lucianne Goldberg, who pretended to be a journalist to spy on the Democrats, is now trying to condemn Michael Jackson the very same way that morality Czar, Bill Bennett condemned President Clinton. It looks like the anti-Michael Jackson agenda is political in nature --it has absolutely nothing to do with criminal justice.

Like mother like son --both Jonah and Lucianne like to pretend that they are journalists.

628  Date: 2003-11-23 18:46:21
Kalimera S. ( no email / no homepage) wrote:


627  Date: 2003-11-23 18:44:01
David Sween ( sween@email.com / no homepage) wrote:

Mickey Sherman is a very weird criminal defense attorney. He said that the guilt or innocense of Michael Jackson rests on the testimony of a single "cancer victim". Very strange --no wonder innocent people like Michael Skakel are convicted. It sounds like he has already condemned Michael Jackson.

The truth is not about documenting testimony, it is about assessing credibility.

626  Date: 2003-11-23 15:31:22
Lynne Foster ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Attorney Gloria Allred filed a formal complaint with the Santa Barbara County Department of Child Welfare Services on Friday to request an investigation into the welfare of the singer's three children.

"I believe that the children should be temporarily removed from Mr. Jackson's care and custody because of the history of Michael Jackson with children and his statements that I have outlined, combined with the present criminal allegations," Allred said at a news conference at her law office in Los Angeles, California.

Allred has filed two similar complaints with the same department in the past year against Jackson.

Why are the people who are targeting Scott Peterson also targeting Michael Jackson? Gloria Allred had also targeted President Bill Clinton when she had filed an amicus brief in support of Paula Jones. Is this all about politics?

625  Date: 2003-11-21 18:50:18
Jeff Weatherspoon ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Michael Jackson is like John Lennon, a perpetual target of ignorant authorities. Don't tell me it is just a coincidence that a Nixonian Justice Department is ultimately behind this public lynching? -DUH !!!

624  Date: 2003-11-21 12:38:01
Lynne Foster ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

On September 20, 2003, Nancy Grace hijacked Larry King Live and proved that this DA has absolutely no case against Michael Jackson. Kidnapping charges? BALONEY. They are obviously confused. It is Laci Peterson who was kidnapped, The suggestion that a crazy woman who wanted to move into Neverland has a son who was molested by Michael Jackson is too preposterous to take seriously. By the way, I too am not allowed to post on Court TV message boards because I refuse to tolerate their BALONEY.

Nancy Grace, Diane Dimond and the crazy woman who wanted to move into Necverland are amusing the world. The movie is already in the works and the only appropriate title I can possibly think of is --3 psychiatric patients meet Hercules.

I obviously cannot convey this message through Court TV message Boards, but I am absolutely certain that the first thing that Nancy Grace does, every morning, is to review Bob's message board.

623  Date: 2003-11-19 19:51:40
Beth Wilson ( no email / http://jackson.alturl.com) wrote:

When I posted this url on Court TV, my posting privileges were suspended.


Court TV appears to be the major force behind promoting the allegation that Michael Jackson will be arrested. Is this merely an effort to discredit the obvious facts that nsnews exposed, on February 14, 2003? Scott Peterson's home and Neverland have reinvented the meaning of the word, "crime scene".

622  Date: 2003-11-19 16:36:13
Case Closed ( no email / https://skakel.tripod.com/over.htm) wrote:


621  Date: 2003-11-19 13:03:44
David Sween ( sween@email.com / no homepage) wrote:

Conner was either delivered under the stress of being kidnapped, or Laci was buried in a shallow grave where her body deteriorated and when the murderers sea washed the evidence, he was released.

620  Date: 2003-11-18 23:57:08
Jeff Weatherspoon ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

The killers left no clues on the bodies of Laci and Conner, regarding how or when this was done. That sounds like the Chandra Levy murder. That's what you call, 'Murders in Modesto'. Dominick Dunne was sued when he falsely accused Gary Condit. Why don't we hear about that anymore, another censored story?

619  Date: 2003-11-18 21:56:03
Tom Wilkinson ( tom5515@yahoo.com / http://www.geocities.com/botenth/national.htm) wrote:

This is a very sad day for justice.

Mark Geragos said it best. In California, the preliminary hearing standard for determining whether a case will go to trial should be higher than the current, "is the defendant still breathing?" This is not and should not be an acceptable standard because it encourages murderers. Clearly, if the people who murdered Laci Peterson can rely upon incompetent prosecutors to cover up a murder, justice is not well served. Scott Peterson should not be in jail because the evidence to suggest that he dumped Laci in San Fransisco Bay does not exist, notwithstanding the fact that Laci and Conner "washed up" separately on the eastern shore of San Francisco Bay in April, nearly four months after Laci Peterson was reported missing. The simple fact of the matter is, the bodies miraculously "washed up" because the desperate murderers needed to force the prosecutors hand, and that is not what you call justice. That is what you call cancelling the CBS, Reagan mini-series -or bowing to political pressure. Justice is supposed to be blind, it is not supposed to be stupid.

618  Date: 2003-11-18 03:46:57
Jack Nichols ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Scott's critics love to exploit ignorance. When I saw Nancy Grace pompously challenge the defense to explain the sea washed evidence, I think, it is safe to say that she is too cockey for her own good. First and foremost, there is no good reason to believe that Laci and Connor were in the sea since December 24th. The prosecution has failed to prove anything --they did not even ask their own pathologist whether there was any water in the lungs of Laci and Connor and the lapse speaks for itself.

Given the obvious fact that the bodies of Laci and Connor were planted [since the microscope has cleared Scott] I think that Laci and Connor were buried in a shallow grave and sea washed for 24 hours or so, perhaps trapped in some kind of mesh or net, to allow the sea to erase evidence of burial.

Clearly, if that is what happened, only the murderers are in a position to prove that, and if Nancy Grace thinks that she can blame Scott, it is in line with the way she treated Richard Albert Ricci and jeopardized the opportunity to rescue Elizabeth Smart.

617  Date: 2003-11-15 19:48:48
Join the Great Debate ! ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Don't be shy -REPLY !


616  Date: 2003-11-15 15:41:50
Laura Dougherty ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Ron Frey said Amber was hurt when Peterson told her he was not going to be around for Christmas: "He told her he was going to Paris. Nobody leaves his girlfriend alone on Christmas. He told her that because of his job, he had to travel all over the country and that it was not unusual for him to be gone from home for up 30 days at time."

Scott Peterson was trying to dump the cling-on who was in fact sleeping with yet another married men, at the very same time she slept with Scott. Amber is a victim? Who did Amber really work for, since she obviously targeted married men, to earn her living?

If Scott is such an evil murderer, why did she want to spend time with him, during Christmas? Hilarious, isn't it? --a "whore" who sleeps with married men expects to spend Christmas with them?

615  Date: 2003-11-15 14:55:27
Lynne Foster ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

A detective said investigators trying to solve the mystery of Laci Peterson's disappearance believed her husband killed her and dumped her in San Francisco Bay. These same detectives evidently planted their seeds of suspicion in the National Enquirer. Strange, when even they were puzzled about how Scott Peterson could possibly jettison Laci's body without capsizing, but that did not make them abandon their erroneous beliefs. The disappearance of Laci Peterson was consequently never investigated because the police were looking for a body, when Laci was probably alive.

614  Date: 2003-11-15 13:28:53
Gayle Lewis ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

This Prosecution kills me. First, the police say that there was no salt water on Scott's boat --he didn't go fishing. When eyewitnesses disputed this lie, they said that Scott Peterson did not know what he was fishing for. Now, they say that Scott said he had gone golfing, even though Scott had a fishing license for the 24th of December.

So what is the prosecutor trying to prove here? --that Scott Peterson had a golfing alibi but he produced a Berkeley Marina receipt, so that everybody can call him a liar? Sounds like a Letterman joke.

613  Date: 2003-11-15 12:35:25
DA is right. ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Doctor says Conner was a full term baby. It was a Double Murder. Over at Court TV., Scott's critics are saying that Scott placed a piece of tape over Laci's vagina, to prevent coffin birth. VERY SICK PEOPLE !

612  Date: 2003-11-14 21:11:59
Barb Douglas ( barbdouglas@techie.com / no homepage) wrote:

3 seperate witnesses (confirmed by police on stand) reported that 2 men were seen in the park the morning of the 24th. John and Karma Souza told detective Owen they saw a suspicious man in a puffy jacket and blue jeans who "popped out of bushes" as they jogged on a trail in East La Loma Park early that morning.

The couple reported that the men were dishevelled and scared them. The other witness, a nurse who was having a smoke break, was watching the park and saw a pregnant woman walking a Golden Retriever. The two men were close by her and the dog was barking incessantly. One man told Laci to "shut the fucken dog up!" and Laci was pulling hard on Mackenzie's leash. The nurse then went inside. 2 days later she saw the flyer of missing Laci and said, "I've seen that woman in the park." Anybody, other than Nancy Grace, believe that these creeps did not kidnap Laci Peterson on Christmas Eve?

611  Date: 2003-11-14 19:31:48
Tom Wilkinson ( tom5515@yahoo.com / no homepage) wrote:

If Nancy Grace is right about the claim that Laci disappeared in tan pants, then how did Scott know that 3 independent people would see Laci [dressed in black and white as Scott reported] and a golden retriever in the park? Is Scott Peterson clairvoyant?

610  Date: 2003-11-14 17:04:48
Laura Dougherty ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

It would be easier to believe that Scott Peterson murdered Laci if she was wearing black and white, when the body was recovered. Only the killer or killers know what Laci Peterson was wearing on the day that Laci Peterson was murdered. Scott Peterson had no idea.

Get the message?


609  Date: 2003-11-14 13:44:34
Richard Turpin ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Nancy Grace claims that tan pants prove that Scott murdered Laci on December 23rd. How wonderful. Those of us who post on message boards laughed at all the suspicious leaks about the trucker eyewitness who allegedly proved that Laci Peterson was murdered on December 23rd. The story about the tan pants is more of the same. Nancy and Al have been Dis-Graced. Shame on them. They should have worried about what Laci was wearing when she disappeared because it was their duty to serve and protect the interests of Laci Peterson the way they were protected when Elizabeth Smart was kidnapped. To be sure, the demagoguery of Nancy claimed an innocent life in the Smart case as well, but what else can anybody expect from her?

608  Date: 2003-11-14 12:48:48
Gayle Lewis ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Laci changed, after Scott left, to go fishing. She wore her tan pants because they were more comfortable. The other pregnant lady with the dog that looked like Mackenzie, wore black pants and a white top. Hey, let's all forget about real evidence and make it up as we go along, to suit our own theory. At this point, who cares what Laci was wearing when she was kidnapped, it's too late to look for her. How did she die, when did she die and who killed her?

607  Date: 2003-11-14 11:54:48
Lynne Foster ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

When you plant suspicion, you frame a suspect. When you investigate, you discover the truth. That is the difference between Al Brocchini and David Sween.

606  Date: 2003-11-14 02:47:06
David Sween ( sween@email.com / no homepage) wrote:

The claim that Laci's body was recovered with the very same, tan pants she wore on December 23rd, is as bizarre as the claim that Amber Frey was taping Scott Peterson's phonecalls BEFORE Laci was murdered.

Clearly, when the evidence strongly suggests that the plot to murder Laci Peterson was pre-meditated to the point where the people who kidnapped her planned to get away with this horrific crime by blaming Scott Peterson, the pattern of exposing the evidence in a predictable manner that conforms to an overall strategy --to blame Scott -- is too predictable and too scripted. Evidence does not unfold in a predictable and scripted manner unless it is deliberately designed to cover up the truth.

Think about it. I am not Nancy Grace. If Scott was a conniving, heartless murderer, why would he lie about what Laci was wearing when he killed her? If Scott was that stupid, he would create the need to destroy 2 seperate sets of evidence --he would have to get rid of Laci's body, and then, he would have to get rid of the black pants and the white top that Laci reportedly wore, on the day she disappeared. Why would anybody take such a ridiculous, unecessary chance? It does not make any sense.

I understand the urge to call Scott Peterson stupid, but this is not stupidity. Ordinary people did not conspire to lie about what Laci wore on the day she disappeared, and having confirmed the timing of their observations, Laci's dog did not represent any pregnant lady, beyond Scott Peterson's wife.

If Laci was not reportedly wearing tan pants when she surfaced, I would have been shocked, surprised and disappointed. Laci's murderers made another BIG mistake. It's not the crime -no cause of death, no motive, no time of death --it's the cover up...

605  Date: 2003-11-13 20:36:37
Lynne Foster ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Detective Al Brocchini testified that the police coached Peterson's mistress on how to coax Peterson into confessing he killed his pregnant wife, and "planted seeds of suspicion" among his friends in hopes they would become informants.

But if you read the Boards, the common consensus is that confessions have proved to be relatively useless.


604  Date: 2003-11-13 03:27:51
David Sween ( sween@email.com / no homepage) wrote:

I was watching Larry King Live today and Nancy Grace made a statement which was the exact opposite of message #602. Nancy Grace claimed that if Scott was not the murderer, he would have been playing golf on December 24th. What a bizarre claim.

Does Nancy Grace read this message board, or was this just a bizarre coincidence? Is there anything about this case that is not bizarre?

603  Date: 2003-11-11 15:26:45
Barb Douglas ( barbdouglas@techie.com / no homepage) wrote:

I think that this website proves that the bodies of Laci and Connor were planted by desperate murderers:


602  Date: 2003-11-10 02:43:32
Lynne Foster ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

The fact that Scott believed that it was too cold to go golfing proves that Scott Peterson did not murder Laci. If Scott had murdered Laci and wanted to establish the perfect alibi, he would have gone golfing. The suggestion that he would establish a fishing alibi using a boat that nobody had heard about is too stupid to take seriously.

601  Date: 2003-11-10 02:21:59
Jack Stewart ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

It is amazing how stupid people are so obsessive about calling Scott a liar that they misrepresent EVERYTHING he says. For example, when Scott says that it was too cold to go golfing, MORONS claim that he is an idiotic liar, because it was colder by the sea where he was boating.

Golf, because of the movements of swinging the club, etc., does not allow you to dress too warmly without affecting your game. Fishing allows you to wear as many clothes as you like, without violating the dress code on the golf course.

The morons who are currently calling Scott Peterson a liar are too stupid for simple reasoning.

600  Date: 2003-11-09 21:06:25
This was reported, January 21, 2003. ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

On Monday, police revealed that the Peterson home was burglarized while Scott was in Southern California. Peterson reported the break-in Sunday night. Police said burglars entered the home through a window sometime between Thursday and Sunday.

"Detectives don't believe the burglary is connected to the Peterson case," said Detective Doug Ridenour, spokesman for the Modesto Police Department.

How do the Detectives know that this burglary was not connected to the disappearance of Laci? Why didn't they get Laci's sister to go through the house, after the burglary?

One more thing. I agree with many of you, this parody of the National Enquirer is an awesome website:


599  Date: 2003-11-09 17:03:49
Lynne Foster ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Not strange at all. The DA is desperate to prove that Laci was murdered before the 24th, and stories about the tan pants are predictable leaks. It's like the magic bullet theory, if you promote one huge lie, you can discredit the entire truth.

598  Date: 2003-11-09 13:05:39
Gayle Lewis ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

If there's no blood on those tan pants, I'd have to agree with David Sween. At this point in time, it is safe to assume that whoever did this horrible deed, is manipulating this investigation. Like he says, why can't anybody find any "real" evidence, like Laci's head?

This media circus about what Laci wore when she disappeared is nauseating. I mean, that should have been resolved a long time ago, if anybody was in fact concerned about rescuing Laci Peterson. Now that she is dead, everybody is into smelling chlorine and into discovering cement powder and pliers in Scott Peterson's boat. What's next, a strand of tan colored material?

We know what Laci was wearing, it was clearly reported by multiple sources, on the day that she vanished without a trace, until the murderers were so frustrated by the failure to implicate Scott, that they did the unthinkable.

597  Date: 2003-11-09 12:45:00
Very Strange. ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Rita Cosby reports Laci found in her clothes from night before(Dec.23rd)...tan pants.

Murderers do not lie in a manner that exposes their crimes. Oh yes, I forgot, Scott is supposed to be an arrogant, evil genius, and we are supposed to applaud the brilliant investigators who exposed him -Rita Cosby and Nancy Grace?

Scott did not hire all the people who spotted Laci, to lie about what she was wearing on the day she was kidnapped. If Laci was in fact wearing tan pants, this is the mother of all frame-ups.

596  Date: 2003-11-08 16:51:30
Is Amber Frey afraid to testify? ( no email / no homepage) wrote:


595  Date: 2003-11-08 15:14:45
David Sween ( sween@mail.com / no homepage) wrote:

Law enforcement has never demonstrated the need to investigate Scott Peterson. When LE found a loaded semi-automatic in Scott's truck, they didn't even test his hands for gun powder residue. Actually, that isn't exactly true. The Cross-Examination of Detective Brocchini is more specific:

Q. Now, and it was because of your having found the pistol that you were interested in doing the GSR test, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And GSR is gunshot residue test, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And Mr. Peterson presented his hand or hands for you to make those kind of swabs, whatever you do to do a GSR test, right?

A. Yes.

Q. And so you did that test?

A. I did.

Q. And so you collected some kind of swabs?

A. Yes.

Q. And what did you do with those after that?

A. I booked them into evidence.

Q. Was anything ever done with them?

A. No.

Q. So they were never tested?

A. Not to my knowledge, unless they're done and I didn't know about it.

This is very strange testimony. A cynic would have to say the tests were done, they were negative, and so they 'lost' them.

Somebody who is more analytical would say that if Scott had shot Laci, the police would have called it a 'hard kill'. A realist would have to conclude that the tests were done, they were negative, and the police turned their attention to 'soft kill' speculation.

It is absolutely ludicrous to suggest that Scott Peterson murdered his wife, given the fact that Detective Brocchini was not even concerned enough to prove or to disprove the claim that Scott Peterson shot Laci. Detective Brocchini is either incompetent, corrupt or he does not care to investigate the murder of Laci Peterson.

594  Date: 2003-11-08 14:30:58
Hannah Harper ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Slow down there sister, you're giving us whores a bad name. We have hearts too, ya know, or didn't you think we were smart enough to surf. If my john had lost his wife, I would stand by his side until we found out what happened to his poor little woman. If we were all into this blackmail crap, we would be out of business. I am an uncertified, proud member of the oldest profession, Amber Frey IS NOT a whore. Blackmailer, okay, but puhleeze DO NOT call Amber Frey a whore. I do not tape my men, I just fuck them.

593  Date: 2003-11-08 13:56:39
Gayle Lewis ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

The police are destroying their credibility when they use Amber Frey. Amber had another relationship with another married man, the wife was pregnant and she taped his phone calls....as she did with Scott on her own.

We are talking about a whore who blackmails men for a living and that is the only thing that all the "incriminating" photos where she shoves her ugly face in Scott's direction, prove. If you look at poor Scott in some of these photos, he is doing his "gentleman's" best to pull away from this aggressive whore.

If we would like to start hanging men who sleep with whores, we need to change the law first.

592  Date: 2003-11-08 05:39:33
Sarah88 ( sarah101@earthlink.net / no homepage) wrote:

This D.A. is a monster... He forced Lee Peterson up there on the stand to HELP TAKE HIS OWN CHILD'S LIFE AWAY in this death penalty trial!! What a cruel sicko!! How much pain has this man already endured, losing his daughter-in-law and baby grandson, then being faced with seeing his youngest, beloved son go to jail - and now he's making this poor man unwillingly testify against his own child in DEATH PENALTY TRIAL?!

What is Brazelton - Nancy Grace's father, Gloria Allred's lover, and Ken Starr's teacher?

591  Date: 2003-11-08 05:32:09
Lynne Foster ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

I love the claim that Scott bought his boat the very same day he told Amber he was a widower. What a fascinating game of connect the dolts.

590  Date: 2003-11-08 05:16:33
Paul McCMurray ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Good point Chris, it takes a whole degree of arrogance, to lie with a straight face --does this guy think that he has in fact fooled anybody?

On the witness stand, Brocchini admitted neglecting to list, in his report, a pair of yellow-handled pliers among items in Peterson's boat.

David Sween has not neglected anything in his report. Do you know where the story about the pliers came from? Find out here:


589  Date: 2003-11-08 03:53:04
Chris Fielding ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Modesto detective Allen Brocchini, who launched the Christmas Eve investigation into Laci Peterson's disappearance, said Scott Peterson bought the boat Dec. 9 -- the same day Fresno massage therapist Amber Frey later told the officer that she confronted Peterson about being married.

Is this a joke? During her heralded news conference, Amber Frey said that she had no idea that Scott Peterson was married. Is Allen Brocchini trying to prove that he is an idiot?

588  Date: 2003-11-08 03:00:48
Sarah88 ( sarah101@earthlink.net / no homepage) wrote:

"On the Record" is on right now on Fox - Ted Williams, a seasoned homicide detective and defence attorney, is even saying that the work of those on the Modesto Police Department is "clearly sloppy". Thank you, Ted, for stating the OBVIOUS!!

587  Date: 2003-11-07 22:36:26
More about Frey ( no email / no homepage) wrote:



586  Date: 2003-11-07 16:47:12
Roger Blake ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Brocholi should try to be more creative, to sound credible. Amber knew that Scott was married and she knew that his wife was missing. If the claim that Scott told her that he was a widower is not on tape, why is Brocholi even bothering...?

People tend to believe One Big Lie, all these little creative improvisations amount to little chuckles.

Who is telling Amber Frey what to say?


585  Date: 2003-11-07 14:21:31
Thomas Huegenore ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

I find it very difficult to believe that Scott Peterson is a smooth-talking horndog who told all his women he was a widower, just to get them to bed. I mean, if that were true, if Detective Allen Brocchini knew this "bombshell" as early as December 30th as he claims, then why doesn't he prove it through wiretapped evidence?

"He said he lost his wife, this would be the first holiday he was without his wife,"' Frey told Brocchini. Why is Brocchini relying on this level of hearsay?

I think this testimony is one big joke.

584  Date: 2003-11-06 03:23:43
Ted Williams ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

I have seen nothing that remotely resembles a slam dunk in this case. I have seen nothing that resembles a case in this case.

583  Date: 2003-11-04 22:44:52
Sarah88 ( sarah101@earthlink.net / no homepage) wrote:


Detective Evers got on the stand today and ADMITTED HE DID NOT SMELL BLEACH IN THE PETERSON HOME!! They LIED!!

The prosecution team is desperate and they prove it all by their lonesome... making up some boldfaced lie about how police smelled bleach in the home just to get the public to be convinced of Scott's guilt... how evil they are!


If there's bleach in the home and a mop there to clean up the crime scene, WHY IS THERE NO BLOOD?!

Dumb, dumb, dumb. They need to be held in contempt of court for their ignorance alone.

582  Date: 2003-11-04 02:09:54
Jack Lane ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Lynne, you're a hoot. Ted Rowlands now claims that the duct tape that Scott used to post 'find Laci' posters was wrapped around Laci's body.

I guess they have already found an alternative way to blame Scott, since Amber is such a proven liar.

581  Date: 2003-11-04 01:42:09
Lynne Foster ( no email / no homepage) wrote:

Justice is very bizarre lately. On the day that Jeffrey Toobin claims that Amber Frey is not going to testify, Linda Tripp is awarded $600,000 because of the ridiculous claim that her privacy rights were violated. Sounds like Republican hush money.

Jeffrey Toobin suggests that Amber Frey is not going to testify because she can't survive cross examination. No kidding? Amber Frey is a certified liar and the prosecution knows it. Amber claims that Scott had said that he was a widower but she never asked him how his former wife died --not even for the benefit of the police, who were telling her what to ask Scott. Is this a joke? No wonder the prosecutor does not dare to introduce Amber's surveillance tapes into evidence -the tapes prove that Amber's effort to create the impression that Scott is a murderer, are absoloutely fabricated. It is only a matter of time before Amber Frey receives her $600,000 payment to keep her mouth shut. Gloria Allred has certainly muzzled Amber, but who is paying for the high, prohibitive cost of keeping everybody quiet --the National Enquirer is simply too resourceful, to call this massive muzzle campaign anything less than a multi-million dollar operation.

Laci Peterson deserved better.

Watershed Reports on Laci Peterson Investigation
January  30,  2003
February 21, 2003
March 16, 2003
March 21, 2003
April 4, 2003
April 10, 2003
May 29, 2003
June 3, 2003
September 23, 2003
October 20, 2003
January 14, 2004






Preliminary Inquiry