Author
|
Comment
|
alanagreen
(12/11/02 11:12:01 pm)
|
Ken Littleton committed perjury at Michael Skakel's trial !
Famous Yesjames Post
(12/11/02 8:12:02 pm)
Keep training your little buddy -GREAT JOB ! ! !
--------------------------------------------------
Tiger stay on the cover up, you are doing a great job !
___________________________________________
Littleton testified that after Moxley's body was found, family advisers suddenly directed him to take Skakel, his siblings and a cousin to upstate New York, about two and a half hours away, where the Skakels had another home.
Littleton said there had been no travel plans for that weekend until after the slaying was discovered. He said they stayed in Windham, N.Y., for the weekend and he never heard the children discuss the killing.
Most people concede the fact that if Michael Skakel had murdered Martha Moxley, Ken Littleton would know about it. I think this evidence is as powerful as a 'smoking gun' because the witness for the prosecution is essentially Michael Skakel's best alibi.
_________________________________________
Oh, goodness gracious me, Littleton read this and revised his alibi !
__________________________________________
Good work Tiger ! -no room for appeal there !
__________________________________________
The above post set off a tidal wave of rebuttals and nonsense posts from imho and Brenda. We are talking about a level of unprecedented chatter and hysteria. An instant rebuttal and simultaneous nonsense posts from Brenda and imho is proof positive that they have been authorized to lie. Needless to say, it was only a matter of time before the the reason behind this hysterical, frenetic spam became clear [because it always relates to the zeal to cover up the truth about the murder of Martha Moxley.]
___________________________________________
Famous Brenda too Post
(12/11/02 8:19:08 pm)
Reply Re: Tiger cites poetry whenever he blows a fuse ! ! !
--------------------------------------------------------------
Two questions, bess.
(1) When did Littleton change his alibi?
and
(2) do you REALLY think people read your stuff? i mean your my best friend and i haven't read more than a paragraph.
_______________________________________________
Brenda is the queen of nonsense spam, and her serious concern about the credibility of Ken Littleton, was a red light.
Tiger always claims "Ken Littleton testified truthfully for nearly 3 full days" and the fact that Ken Littleton has now revised his testimony for the sake of denying Michael Skakel an alibi, proves that Ken Littleton spent nearly 3 full days lying through his teeth, except of course, when he claimed that he stabbed Martha Moxley in the neck. Needless to say, Ken Littleton perjured himself when he testified against Michael Skakel.
On Tuesday 12 December, 2002, Littleton claimed that Michael Skakel said, "I did it and you are going to get blamed for it." Why didn't Prosecution witness Ken Littleton tell the jury that Michael Skakel confessed to having murdered Martha Moxley? Let me guess, could it be that he was afraid of tripping up, on cross-examination? I mean, can't you just picture Mickey Sherman say, "but you said you were the one who stabbed Martha Moxley in the neck with the Skakel golf club." Ken Littleton further said, "Michael Skakel was on a multitude of drugs which caused his mind to be genetically altered and his behavior to be obstructed. Michael Skakel wasn't Michael Skakel at the time of the murder. It was the drug dealers who caused his mind to be altered and polluted." Nice try Ken, but this convenient revision [which facilitates Brenda's wacko claim that Skakel may have murdered Martha Moxley but does not recall] is evidently grounds for perjury, unless anybody is gullible enough to believe somebody like Tiger, who claims that "Ken Littleton testified truthfully for nearly 3 full days."
Surprise surprise folks, the witness for the prosecution is still Michael Skakel's best alibi !
AUTHORIZED SPY RESUME
_____________________
On(10/1/02 8:20:52 am) IMHO said, "I do know where you live. I don't have to explain it to you."
On(11/22/02 7:10:16 pm) IMHO said, "I don't need to spy to know everything I know about you, alanagreen, and RFK Jr."
On(11/23/02 7:19:58 am) yesjames said "Why do you constantly and fraudulently claim that Alana Green is from Australia? It is quite obvious that you cannot handle the criminal implications of your "authorized spy" status, and you and your fellow Homeland Security Spooks are clearly violating FEDERAL LAW when you constantly stalk Alana Green.
IMHO has repeatedly said "I do know where you live. I don't have to explain it to you" and the clear implication of this constant boast is that she has been authorized to obtain private and personal information, but she is not authorized to disclose the source. In plain talk, imho is an authorized spy and authorized spies like imho do not explain the source of their authorization.
An Oxymoron like John Poindexter has consolidated the world of Total Awareness and Total Secrecy, and authorized spies like imho spam the Internet 24/7, to enhance the capacity to tyrannize reasonable people.
The authorized spies who are working the "Skakel File" do not need Poindexter, they have plenty of experience without having to rely upon his obsession to perfect the opportunity to tyrannize.
Indeed, the tactics are all the same. The only thing that changes is the target, and in this case, it is Kennedy cousin, Michael Skakel.
This is the flavor of the "authorized spy" scorecard:
_________________________
8 year Plan -the Clinton Years
_____________
Vincent Foster -success
Jim McDougal -success
Clinton Impeachment -failure
Susan McDougal -survived
Julie Hiatt Steele -survived
________________________
8 Year Plan -the Bush Years
______________
Gregory Coleman -success
Chandra Levy -success
Paul Wellstone -success
Michael Skakel -success pending Appeal
__________________________
www.SKAKEL.shorturl.com
|
(11/30/02 4:30:12 pm)
|
I thing Goldberg is an authorized spy now.
Remember Lucianne Goldberg: In pursuit of Clinton? The conviction of Michael Skakel reflects absolutely nothing, beyond Lucianne Goldberg, in pursuit of Skakel.
Lucianne Goldberg edited Mark Fuhrman's book and that is the salient fact which explains the bizarre conviction of Michael Skakel.
Lucianne Goldberg does not deal in the facts, she manufactures delusions. In particular, the tactic to turn the former Skakel tutor, Ken Littleton, into a poor, helpless victim, is straight out of the Lucianne Goldberg play-book. The literary agent who persuaded White House employee Linda Tripp to tape her telephone conversations with Monica Lewinsky, precipitated the impeachment of a president. Why should the pursuit of Skakel produce an impact which is any less significant or bizarre?
The meticulous campaign to turn a disturbed man like Ken Littleton into a victim like Linda Tripp, is vintage Goldberg. Nobody bought the claim that Linda Tripp was a victim. The jury bought the claim that Ken Littleton was a victim, because the prosecutor [who was following the Goldberg/Fuhrman script] erroneously claimed that Michael Skakel murdered Martha Moxley.
A trained spy like Lucianne Goldberg is extremely deceptive, and it is her signature, not her fingerprints, which betray her role in the plot to frame Michael Skakel. Her leak-proof profile is so low, that she is widely regarded to be one of 'Dorothy Moxley's Angels' even though she has not publicly bragged about the conviction of Michael Skakel. Why not? Why doesn't Dorothy's angel brag about Michael Skakel's conviction, if it is legitimate? More importantly, is there anything legitimate, about the conviction of Michael Skakel?
As soon as Dominick Dunne was passed a stolen copy of a private detective's report on the murder of Martha Moxley, Lucianne Goldberg called. He was reading the report "And then, at that very moment," Dunne recalls, "I got a call from Lucianne Goldberg." Surprise, surprise.
Ken Littleton has a story to tell, but in the hands of a fiction producer like Lucianne Goldberg, the mentally disturbed, former Skakel tutor, is a blank slate who will do or say absolutely anything, to get away with murder. Ken Littleton was responsible for supervising Michael Skakel on the day that Martha Moxley was murdered and there is no excuse for giving this murderer an alibi.
Ken Littleton is a desperate murderer who still clings to the preposterous alibi that he did not know who Martha Moxley was, and his obvious involvement in the murder of Martha Moxley was not scrutinized, until the Sutton Associates Report was appropriately analyzed by a competent Detective.
Since then, anybody with common sense, clearly understands the fact that Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley. Even Alana Green demonstrates a clear understanding, when she says; "Are you aware of the fact that Ken Littleton is the tutor who wanted to play hide the salami? -very normal if he wasn't a lunatic who could not cope with the unstructured environment the Skakel household offered, on the day that Martha Moxley was murdered." It's all about sex, after all.
For those of you who have not read the investigation which has cracked the Martha Moxley, murder mystery, you can find it here:
www.SKAKEL.shorturl.com
|
alanagreen
Registered User
Posts: 4141
(11/30/02 9:42:35 am)
Reply
|
Did the Prosecution catch Mickey Sherman with his pants down
I have yet to find a single, solitary soul, who understands the fact that Michael Skakel, who was a 15 year old child at the time of a horrific murder, was convicted for the brutal slaying, 27 years after the fact.
Even senile, senior citizens laugh at the prospect, and fall asleep mouthing words like, "someone must have seen him do it."
What type of a person has the temerity to insist that Michael Skakel murdered Martha Moxley, when the evidence does not?
The claim that Michael Skakel murdered Martha Moxley makes the single bullet theory sound credible. In terms of the Skakel conviction, this is the single bullet, in action:
"Treacherous spy, Lucianne Goldberg, handed the ball to the magical, Corrupt Detective, Mark Fuhrman, who OJ’d the Skakel case and managed to produce a perverse verdict because playboy bunny, Mickey Sherman was invited to so many sexciting parties in New York City, that the prosecutor himself could not help bragging about the fact that he caught Mickey with his pants down."
If you thought the ‘magic bullet theory’ was stupid, follow the trajectory of the ‘Lucy in the sky with Fuhrman’ theory.
Oh yes, and the people at Campskakel, who insist upon Michael’s guilt ---they’re ‘authorized spies’ --- they get paid to spam message boards. I do not. Even the services of the creepy, Wall Street lawyer, Gerald Posner, were prepared to be deployed in the campaign to cover up the truth, but the sexy girls who serviced Mickey Sherman, proved to be far more effective in the plot to catch Mickey with his pants down.
|
yesjames
Registered User
Posts: 1008
(8/2/02 6:42:14 pm)
|
Why wasn't Littletomn PROSECUTED?
April 7, 1976: Ken Littleton refuses to talk to detectives and refuses to sign a statement about Tommy Skakel.
April 13, 1976: Ken Littleton retains Attorney John Meerbergen and notifies police.
April 22, 1976: Detectives re-interview Ken Littleton with his lawyer present.
October 18, 1976: Ken Littleton fails a polygraph test.
October 19, 1976: Ken Littleton tells police that his attorney has advised him not to submit himself for tests.
May 1977: Ken Littleton is given 5-7 years suspended sentence for burglary charges in Nantucket, Mass. Littleton refuses to submit to a sodium amytal interview in return for reduced charges.
Who in his right mind, would give this man immunity from prosecution?
Clearly, Ken Littleton has made an absolute mockery out of the administration of justice.
|
The Justice Club
Registered User
Posts: 491
(8/5/02 6:09:42 am)
|
westportage is absolutely disturbed
What 15 year old kid would masturbate in a tree in 36° degree weather, after throwing stones at a window?
**A normal horny 15 yr old in 1975--before they were leagally allowed to beat off to the image Brittney SpearsI think 15 yr old boys masturbate all the time... what do you think of Hammond masturbating into condemns and KEEPING them? yuck! Further--what do make of grown men beating off on the computer and the phone?
Someone who is afraid of the dark, was quite comfortable running around the neighborhood peeping in everyone's window, and masturbating in plain view.
*** who said he masturbated in plain view? Remember, he did not ejaculate-- he only didit for like 30 seconds...then stopped.
In Michael's book deal, he didn't even consider the feeling's of the Moxley's when talking about their murdered daughter—and he didn't even show any remorse that he had lost a friend to a brutal murder. That's a bit strange!
*** "Michals book deal" was a proposal-- they always hype those up. I think Michael looked and helped look for Martha-- it was Peter Ziluca< Martha's steady boyfriend, who was acting strange...not calling about her or looking for her...he was not even concerned! ( Recall she laid out with him till 3 am weekend before)
If he had such a solid alibi for so many years, and wasn't even considered a suspect because of this, why did he add more information later on that would have been valuable then?
***All I know is morons investgated this trial--do you recall Steve Carroll for years said he had NO DOUBT in his mind it was Tommy Skakel--- he even harrassed Tommy so much that the Skakel's di dnot allow the police to use their home DAILY as MM HQ? Steve Carroll thought the lesbians killed Martha because Martha was 'well endowwed"--with mentalities like Steve Carroll's. no wonder they never questioned Peter Ziluca...
|
The Justice Club
Registered User
Posts: 490
(8/5/02 6:01:11 am)
|
not polite to point!
Oh yesjames! remember, Dorthy testified that she doesnt like to point-- she was raised not to point, it was impolite "I really don't like to point" was her response when the court asked her to point out the defendant in the courtroom (even though she points constantly--thats why Nick Dunne brags Dorthy has become "so media savvy")...
Erudi or Bob, whatever you try to say your name is-- motive doe snot have to be established in CT--so why do you ask for a motive of Littleton smashing up Martha that night?
What was Littleton's motive when he knocked that woman on the floor in a bar on cape cod?
What was Littleton's motive when he scaled a 16 story building in Florida spitting out President Kennedys Berlin wall address?
What was Littleton'
s motive when he tolds the cops he WAS a Kennedy, and his name was Kenny Kennedy?
What was Littleton's motive when he stabbed himself at least 11 times recently claiming he was stabbed by the Kennedys ( when it was just another suicide attempt)?
What was Littelton's motive when he attempted to extort money form Martha's father, David Moxley?
What was adult Littleton's motive for geetting the young underaged Skakel children drunk that night?
Why wasn't Littleton able to testify that he knew Michael bashed Marthas brains out her head and ripped half her face off with a golf club? Is there a motive for not being able to testify to that? ( He was the caretaker of the boys, afterall-- don't you think he would catch wind of it?)
|
yesjames
Registered User
Posts: 2213
(9/19/02 3:42:15 am)
Reply
|
Like Coleman, Ken Littleton is a 'Dead Man Talking'.
There is nothing, absolutely nothing easier on this entire planet, than to create the false impression that Ken Littleton is a victim. The poor fellow is on enough drugs and he has probably had enough shock therapy to light up Las Vegas. Ken Littleton is the sort of witness who makes a man like Jim McDougal appear to be an absolute genius, even when Jim McDougal was at the lowest point of his entire life -and we all know what happened to Jim McDougal when he reached that desperate depth.
Anybody on this planet, who currently believes that it is reasonable or proper to hang a dog on the strength of the testimony that Littleton gave at the Skakel trial, is perverse.
Indeed, despite the false impression that Ken Littleton was a credible witness for the Prosecution, Ken Littleton is in fact Michael Skakel's best alibi because the only thing that Ken Littleton conclusively proved is that Michael Skakel HAS NEVER confessed to having murdered Martha Moxley. These are the reasons which lead to the conclusion that Ken Litleton is Michael Skakel's best alibi, and I genuinely believe that most reasonable people will accept them.
I offer this evidence with the firm and absolute conviction that anybody who reads it and still suggests that the conviction of Michael Skakel is justifiable, does not in fact believe in the Constitution of the United States of America. Ken Littleton is and was a "walking dead man" -a blank slate in the hands of any unscrupulous Prosecutor, but Ken Littleton also has a definite history which proves that he has always managed to evade accountability, and it is time to pay the piper. it is time to stop treating Ken Littleton like a victim.
I begin this presentation by deliberately ridiculing the tactics of the Prosecution, because the tactics of the Prosecution deserve ridicule.
Judge: What evidence do you have to prove that Michael Skakel murdered Martha Moxley?
Prosecutor: Gregory Coleman said so judge.
Judge: And where is Mr. Coleman today?
Prosecutor: He's dead judge, what do you expect, he didn't know what to do with his bonus money.
Judge: What do you mean?
Prosecutor: Well, he's a heroin addict judge, what do you think he did with the 10 thousand dollar bonus?
Judge: He overdosed?
Prosecutor: That's right judge -what da ya expect from the scum of the earth?
Judge: And was his testimony reliable?
Prosecutor: Of course it was judge, he was happier than @#%$.
Judge: What do you mean?
Prosecutor: Why he was stoned judge?
Judge: And how could you rely on his testimony?
Prosecutor: Hell, judge, if he didn't say that Skakel took the golf club out of the Skakel garage and stabbed Martha Moxley in the neck, he wasn't gonna see any more heroin. Where's he gonna get the money?
Judge: But the Skakels didn't have a garage.
Prosecutor: Hell judge, they had a golf club, didn't they?
Judge: You're not trying to catch me with my pants down, are you?
A key prosecution witness gives testimony while high on heroin (April 19, 2001)
According to Coleman, Michael Skakel "drove her skull in with a golf club" and boasted "I'm gonna get away with murder, I'm a Kennedy." No doubt, Coleman was reading the version of Mark Fuhrman's book that Lucianne Goldberg had personally edited. If Lucianne Goldberg was editing a book on President Clinton, the script would be "he had sex with Monica Lewinsky" and boasted "nobody will ever find out because I told her to lie." And if Monica Lewinsky had "overdosed" it would be the only recorded version of "fact" the media ever covered.
Rest assured, the truth has absolutely nothing to do, with what the media covers. The media can serve a pablum version of surface reality for mass consumption, but it has lost its capacity to think. The media does not delve into the fact that corrupt people, like Mark Fuhrman's editor, the notorious Lucianne Goldberg, are obviously Ken Littleton's handlers. Ken Littleton is mentally disturbed. Ken Littleton is a lunatic who does not have the capacity to cover up the murder of Martha Moxley, without the support of sophisticated propagandists like Lucianne Goldberg.
Lucianne Goldberg is a politically motivated, "dirty tricks" specialist, who is unrivalled in her capacity to target an individual, for the sake of advancing a political agenda. Michael Skakel is an ideal target to be labelled a murderer because the "Kennedy cousin" provides the opportunity to falsely bolster the credibility of persistent, anti-Kennedy slander that is legendary and historic. In particular, right wing fanatics have been financing slanderous allegations like the highly publicized claim that the Kennedys are responsible for the murder of young women like Marilyn Monroe, for the past 40 years. Not surprisingly, a key highlight of the anti-Skakel witchhunt is the claim that Michael Skakel thought that he could get away with the murder of Martha Moxley because he was a Kennedy, and that reflects the emotional investment of the obsession to convict Michael Skakel. If anybody thinks that a good old spy like Lucianne Goldberg would miss the opportunity to exploit the murder of Martha Moxley, think again.
And that is why "Kennedy cousin" Michael Skakel, was aggressively targeted and convicted for the murder of Martha Moxley and why Prosecution witness Gregory Coleman did not live long enough to blow the whistle.
The testimony of Ken Littleton, the other key Prosecution witness, was equally the product of intense manipulation. His speech slowed by six psychotropic drugs treating his bi-polar disorder, Littleton said he never met Moxley. On cross-examination, Littleton admitted the fact that he had confessed to having stabbed Martha Moxley in the neck with the Skakel golf club. Those drugs obviously fail to deliver the finality of a cocaine overdose, and if the Prosecutor was not prepared to redirect the confession, to make it appear as though Littleton was the victim of an overzealous witchhunt, Littleton's confession would not be controversial. Needless to say, the Prosecution had made it absolutely certain that the heavily medicated Littleton looked like a victim, and that did not give the jury a realistic picture of the manipulative murderer who claimed the life of Martha Moxley.
The unintended consequence of Ken Littleton's bizarre and scripted testimony is that he has become Michael Skakel's best alibi. In particular, Prosecution witness Ken Littleton did not offer any evidence to link Michael Skakel to the murder of Martha Moxley, and under the circumstances, that is the clearest and most convincing indication of the fact that Michael Skakel did not murder Martha Moxley. As witness for the Prosecution, Ken Littleton did not have any intention beyond the obsession to prove that Michael Skakel murdered Martha Moxley, and his failure to deliver is essentially the ommission that exonerates Michael Skakel. Ken Littleton was responsible for supervising Michael Skakel on the day that Martha Moxley was murdered, and has anybody bothered to ask the question; Why hasn't Ken Littleton ever said that he heard Michael Skakel confess?
It is an absolutely bizarre and peculiar ommission, given the fact that the case against Michael Skakel is based almost entirely on people who said they had heard Skakel confess over the years.
And just when you thought it couldn't get any weirder, the death of Gregory Coleman was absolutely essential because the case against Michael Skakel was based almost entirely on people who said they had heard Skakel confess over the years. Imagine the fate of President Bill Clinton if Linda Tripp and Lucianne Goldberg were granted the opportunity to speak for Monica Lewinsky, and you will understand why Gregory Coleman was murdered.
Are you surprised by the fact Gregory Coleman was dead, by the time Skakel's trial began?
Amazingly, prosecutors were permitted to read Mr. Coleman's pretrial testimony into the record, including the accusation that Skakel once told him: "I'm going to get away with murder, because I'm a Kennedy," and if that does not reflect an absolute travesty of justice, make one up.
In the meantime, this is what the jury should have known about Ken Littleton, to reach a reasonable verdict.
Ken Littleton has consistently acted guilty since the day Martha Moxley was murdered, and it is not possible for anybody who is knowledgeable, to further defend Ken Littleton. Remember, the poor guy is mentally ill, and I think that he can easily be found not guilty, by reason of insanity.
Littleton is very manipulative and he has mastered the art of denial, but at the same time, his alibi is so stupid that he would not have possibly gotten away with murder, if he was seriously targeted for prosecution.
Unfortunately he never was, and if he is never prosecuted, Martha Moxley will never get the justice she deserves.
One of the reasons that Ken Littleton has managed to evade the authorities for so long is that his mental illness and the circumstances which lead to the murder of Martha Moxley, were never seriously analyzed. Moreover, Ken Littleton did not have a motive to murder Martha Moxley, it was a spontaneous act of panic, and such crimes are very difficult to solve. It is easy to criticize the authorities, but they simply did not have the benefit of our current knowledge about biplar disorders, and we cannot possibly criticize them for that.
The August 19, 2002 issue of Time Magazine published a fascinating, up-to-date analysis of people who suffer from bipolar disorder, and that has provided the opportunity to better understand somebody like Ken Littleton. Moreover, this message board has provided the opportunity to discuss all the unanswered questions about the murder of Martha Moxley, and the following summary reflects what we have thus far learned about Ken Littleton:
Bipolar disorder is a ferocious mental illness which makes life extremely challenging. It is a very volatile illness which can be triggered by a traumatic event. In other words, Ken Littleton was an undiagnosed bipolar on the day that Martha Moxley was murdered.
It is very common for a bipolar like Ken Littleton to suffer for at least a decade before his condition is diagnosed because as long as his schedule was structured, his ability to cope was not tested. The follow up question of the fact that unbeknownst to them, the Skakels' had hired a mentally ill tutor, is transparent.
"Why did Ken Littleton fail to cope, on his very first day on the job?"
The answer is simple; Ken Littleton was mentally ill and the fact that he did not have the ability to adjust to his new surroundings was potentially explosive because an untreated bipolar is a threat to himself and to others. Bipolars are easily destabilized when they are forced to react rather than follow the rigor of a schedule, and on the day that Martha Moxley was murdered, Ken Littleton was thrust into an environment that was inadvertently designed to assure the fact that a bipolar disorder sufferer like Ken Littleton would fail to cope.
On the day that Martha Moxley was murdered, the kids in Belle Haven were in a festive mood because the partying appeared to be endless. The official, Halloween eve kick off was called Hacker's Night, when the kids of the community playfully wrapped their neighbors' trees in toilet paper and lobbed eggshells onto passing cars.
From Littleton's perspective, there was no rhyme or reason to what was essentially a perpetual party atmosphere where people were free to come and go as they pleased. Everything about 30 October 1975 appeared to be unstructured, unplanned, spontaneous and normal to everybody except Ken Littleton, who was suddenly thrust into an environment where there were no rules or prescribed schedule to follow.
Despite his mental illness, Ken Littleton, like the rest of us, is guided by human nature, and making friends was as important to him as it was to everybody else in the Skakel household. One of the people who caught Litttleton's attention was the very sexy and flirtatious Martha Moxley, and he naturally asked Michael Skakel about his pretty neighbour.
The attractive, bright, talkative, and good-natured, Martha Moxley was too popular to miss and the fact that she was considered to be very sexy was just one more factor which had made her the vortex of attention and that is what makes Ken Littleton's alibi so absolutely absurd. When Ken Littleton claims that he failed to notice Martha Moxley, he is clearly lying and under the circumstances, as they have unfolded during the past 27 years, there can only be one reason for that lie. Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley. In the final analysis, there is no alternative explanation for that lie because Ken Littleton was a witness for the prosecution, and if Michael Skakel had indeed murdered Martha Moxley as the former tutor would like to suggest, Ken Littleton would have been able to back all the innuendo with facts. Instead, Ken Littleton has stuck to his preposterous alibi, and it is now safe to say that there is one, and only one reason for that. Ken Littleton needs an alibi because he murdered Martha Moxley and Ken Littleton does not have an alibi.
There is nothing implicit about the Moxley murder, the fact that Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley is merely an elaboration of Ken Littleton's inability to adjust to his new surroundings. When Ken Littleton expressed an interest in Martha Moxley, he demonstrated the effort to cope, but he had the capacity of a bipolar disorder and the circumstances that Ken Littleton had to cope with on 30 October 1975 could not have been any less ideal.
Can you imagine the emotional turmoil of an unescorted encounter between Ken Littleton and Martha Moxley? It was clearly a prescription for the tragedy that occurred on October 30, 1975, and that is what makes the claim that Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley so absolutely compelling.
Ken Littleton had great difficulty sorting out Martha's flirtatious behavior with her refusal to be promiscuous, and that created an "explosive" situation. Ken Littleton habituated slowly to the realization that Martha Moxley did not want to have sex with him and his reaction exceeded the usual response, to say the least.
Alana Green captured the essential consequence of Ken Littleton's insanity when she said:
"Ken Littleton reminds me of Lennie Small, in 'Of Mice and Men' and his tragice failure to acheive his dream. I feel sorry for him, it is really a tragic story and John Steinbeck's novel is strikingly familiar. I studied it in school and I still have my heavily underlined copy handy.
For those who are not familiar with the work, it tells the tale of two itinerant farm-workers, George Milton and Lennie Small, and their conversations offer a realistic view of human nature.
For example, when George turned to Lennie and said,
"Books ain't no good. A guy needs somebody-to be near him. A guy goes nuts if he ain't got nobody",
I get a feeling for the picture that Ken Littleton was probably forming when he asked Michael Skakel about Martha Moxley. You have to read Steinbeck's entire novel to appreciate the scope of Lennie's mental illness, and to make a long story short, the tragic Lennie received an invitation to stroke the soft hair of a beautiful, married woman, but he liked it a bit too much. She told him not to mess it up and jerked sideways, at which Lennie, in a panic, grabed on firmly. The woman screamed and Lennie, not wanting his friend George to hear, covered her mouth and nose. As she continued to struggle, Lennie grew angry and ordered her to be quiet, but she was too terrified to stop. Lennie shook her in an effort to subdue her, but broke her neck instead.
When Martha Moxey did not want to go beyond flirting, Ken Littleton punched her in the face and knocked her out. In both instances, the mental illness of Ken Littleton and Lennie Small undermined their capacity to cope with a flirtatious female, and that is evidently a tragedy that is as common in real life, as it is in works of great fiction."
The tired tactics of the desperate hacks who spam this message board to divert attention away from the truth, are no longer welcome. For example, how many times have you heard people like imho, Pam Knox and Eridu, repeat the crass phrase 'park the penis' to ridicule the conclusion that Ken Littleton in fact murdered Martha Moxley? The term was used by a competent, criminal investigator who deserves to be acknowledged for understanding the fact that Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley, and that is the only reason I have ever directed anybody's attention to this:
www.skakel.shorturl.com
Imagine how desperate Ken Littleton's apologists are, when all they can do is ridicule competent criminal investigators who use crass terms, not because the investigators do not know what they are talking about, but because their communication skills are less refined than those of the deceptive, cover up artists who are deliberately distorting the truth about the murder of Martha Moxley.
When Ken Littleton said that he stabbed Martha Moxley in the neck, he was very credible because he said so when he was being cross examined and not during his rehearsed testimony as the witness for the persecution. Morever, even as witness for the prosecution, Ken Littleton did not say that Michael Skakel stabbed Martha Moxley in the neck, and that makes Ken Littleton Michael Skakel's best alibi.
Not surprisingly, Ken Littleton was not forthright until he was cross examined, and he naturally denied killing Martha Moxley, at the behest of a prosecutor who was only interested in gathering evidence against Michael Skakel. But that rehearsed denial is extremely fickle because Ken Littleton was responsible for supervising Michael Skakel, and if he wanted to be a credible, prosecution witness, it was up to Ken Littleton to provide the information which is necessary to determine what in fact happened to Martha Moxley.
Ken Littleton did not provide any evidence until he was cross examined, and that is what makes Ken Littleton's assertion that he stabbed Martha in the neck, so credible. The claim that Ken Littleton stabbed Martha Moxley in the neck is the missing link that only Ken Littleton has satisfactorily explained, and any subsequent denial is simply rehearsed testimony.
Cross examination is the forum that extracts the truth, and that is why it is absolutely clear that Ken Littleton stabbed Martha Moxley in the neck.
Mr. Littleton was cross-examined by Mr. Skakel's defense lawyer, Michael Sherman, who focused on an interview of Mr. Littleton that was videotaped by a state psychiatric investigator, Kathy Morall.
"What did you tell Dr. Morall that you said to Mary?"
"I did it," Mr. Littleton replied.
"And when you say, `I did it,' you are talking about that you committed the murder of Martha Moxley?"
"Correct," Mr. Littleton replied.
"Did you ever tell Mary that you stabbed Martha Moxley through the neck?" Mr. Sherman asked.
"Yes," Mr. Littleton replied.
Ken Littleton's consistent obsession to manufacture an alibi, bolster's the credibility of his confession.
According to Ken Littleton, in his own, carefully chosen words:
"My first night at the Skakel house was Oct. 30, 1975. I never met or saw Martha Moxley before Oct. 30, 1975, or after Oct. 30, 1975."
Ken Littleton's alibi exposes the fact that he acted alone, because when he denied the fact that he had talked to Michael Skakel about Martha Moxley, he exposed the fact that there was no coordinated cover up plot between Littleton and the Skakels.
Littleton testified that after Moxley's body was found, family advisers suddenly directed him to take Skakel, his siblings and a cousin to upstate New York, about two and a half hours away, where the Skakels had another home.
Littleton said there had been no travel plans for that weekend until after the slaying was discovered. He said they stayed in Windham, N.Y., for the weekend and he never heard the children discuss the killing.
Most people concede the fact that if Michael Skakel had murdered Martha Moxley, Ken Littleton would know about it. Ken Littleton was responsible for supervising Michael Skakel on the day that Martha Moxley was murdered, and he should worry less about his obsession to manufacture an alibi to cover his tracks, and more about the safety of the teenagers that he was entusted with.
Ken Littleton always needs and has always needed an alibi to cover up the truth about the murder of Martha Moxley.
Ken Littleton is a cunning, deceptive, manipulative man, who has consistently evade a police investigation. This timeline speaks for itself:
April 5, 1976: Greenwich Police attempt to re-interview Ken Littleton - he declines.
April 7, 1976: Ken Littleton refuses to talk to detectives and refuses to sign a statement about Tommy Skakel.
April 13, 1976: Ken Littleton retains Attorney John Meerbergen and notifies police.
April 22, 1976: Detectives re-interview Ken Littleton with his lawyer present.
October 18, 1976: Ken Littleton fails a polygraph test.
October 19, 1976: Ken Littleton tells police that his attorney has advised him not to submit himself for tests.
When Ken Littleton stopped cooperating with the police, one would think that Ken Littleton would have been charged with murder, but he wasn't. Instead of charging Ken Littleton, the police began to consult psychics, which is a clear demonstration of total desperation. Regardless, Littleton's refusal to cooperate was not acceptable, and that is what has made him the only, credible suspect.
Beyond successfully thwarting a police investigation, Ken Littleton gained new confidence through his capacity to manipulate the media:
January 5, 1983: Detectives talk to Ken Littleton who states he has been talking to reporter Len Levitt. He also states that he is now willing to undergo tests to prove his innocence.
Summer 1983: Len Levitt's article is written on the case - Greenwich Time and Stamford Advocate REFUSES to publish it (so it sits on the self).
June 2, 1991: Len Levitt's article is published in the Greenwich Time under the headline "Moxley Murder Case Still Haunts Greenwich".
November 26, 1995: Len Levitt writes an article for "Newsday Magazine" in which he states that Tommy Skakel has changed his story about what he was doing the night of the murder.
Ken Littleton persuaded Len Levitt to promote the claim that Thomas Skakel murdered Martha Moxley, and he welcomed the opportunity to use the Police to divert attention away from his obvious guilt.
Ken Littleton may think he has successfully fooled the world about the murder of Martha Moxley, but as long as Ken Littleton was responsible for supervising convicted murderer, Michael Skakel, on the day that Martha Moxley was murdered, it is Ken Littleton, not Michael Skakel, who has consistently developed an alibi to cover up the truth about the murder of Martha Moxley.
In retrospect, the murder of Martha Moxley is so transparent we can even reconstruct the probable nature of the conversation that preceded her death:
Martha Moxley's final words.
Ken : I'm the new tutor?
Martha : I know I've heard all about you.
Ken : Michael has told me all about you as well.
Martha : Did you go to Harvard?
Ken : Well, no, but yes it was a fine school.
Martha : It's so nice to
Ken: Hey, do you think we can
Martha: Stop it
Ken: But you are so sexy
Martha: If you grab me again I'm going to scream
Martha Moxley never screamed and Ken Littleton was never tried for the murder of Martha Moxley because he denied her existence. What a stupid alibi!
The man who broke Martha Moxley's nose was not an immature, drunk Skakel brother, but a clever, conniving, disturbed criminal who was as strong and as emotionally crippled as Ken Littleton was. It is not easy to accuse anybody of murder, but Ken Littleton makes it very easy because he has consistently refused to disclose information that is absolutely necessary to determine the truth about the Martha Moxley murder, and if he would like to rely on the right to refuse to incriminate himself, he and he alone is responsible for the claim that he murdered Martha Moxley.
There is no mystery to the murder of Martha Moxley.
"Ken Littleton noticed the attractive, Martha Moxley flirting with the boys and determined to cultivate the opportunity to get his own piece of the action. This is not some 'magic rabbit' conspiracy theory, it is Ken Littleton's own preoccupation with sex, and the following excerpt from the Sutton Associates report, illustrates the point;
Littleton told our investigator he believes Martha could have been lured out of her house, or could have been having a sexual encounter in the mobile home, and then been murdered later, sometime around 11.00 pm and 12.00 am.
Littleton had sex on the brain, Martha Moxley was the available flirt and if his cryptic remarks were not a virtual confession to murder, we could excuse the failure to indict Ken Littleton for the murder of Martha Moxley. To be sure, Littleton made his cryptic comments to prompt the conspiracy theory that Tom and Michael Skakel were responsible for the murder of Martha Moxley, but Tom and Michael Skakel did not have to discover a way to lure Martha Moxley. Tom and Michael Skakel knew Martha Moxley, and the person who murdered her was as unstable, as manipulative and as deceptive as Ken Littleton is.
Bipolar disorder is a ferocious mental illness which makes life extremely challenging. It is a very volatile illness which can be triggered by a traumatic event. In other words, Ken Littleton was an undiagnosed bipolar on the day that Martha Moxley was murdered.
It is very common for a bipolar like Ken Littleton to suffer for at least a decade before his condition is diagnosed because as long as his schedule was structured, his ability to cope was not tested. The follow up question of the fact that unbeknownst to them, the Skakels' had hired a mentally ill tutor, is transparent.
"Why did Ken Littleton fail to cope, on his very first day on the job?"
The answer is simple; Ken Littleton was mentally ill and the fact that he did not have the ability to adjust to his new surroundings was potentially explosive because an untreated bipolar is a threat to himself and to others. Bipolars are easily destabilized when they are forced to react rather than follow the rigor of a schedule, and on the day that Martha Moxley was murdered, Ken Littleton was thrust into an environment that was inadvertently designed to assure the fact that a bipolar disorder sufferer like Ken Littleton would fail to cope.
On the day that Martha Moxley was murdered, the kids in Belle Haven were in a festive mood because the partying appeared to be endless. The official, Halloween eve kick off was called Hacker's Night, when the kids of the community playfully wrapped their neighbors' trees in toilet paper and lobbed eggshells onto passing cars.
From Littleton's perspective, there was no rhyme or reason to what was essentially a perpetual party atmosphere where people were free to come and go as they pleased. Everything about 30 October 1975 appeared to be unstructured, unplanned, spontaneous and normal to everybody except Ken Littleton, who was suddenly thrust into an environment where there were no rules or prescribed schedule to follow.
Despite his mental illness, Ken Littleton, like the rest of us, is guided by human nature, and making friends was as important to him as it was to everybody else in the Skakel household. One of the people who caught Litttleton's attention was the very sexy and flirtatious Martha Moxley, and he naturally asked Michael Skakel about his pretty neighbour.
The attractive, bright, talkative, and good-natured, Martha Moxley was too popular to miss and the fact that she was considered to be very sexy was just one more factor which had made her the vortex of attention and that is what makes Ken Littleton's alibi so absolutely absurd. When Ken Littleton claims that he failed to notice Martha Moxley, he is clearly lying and under the circumstances, as they have unfolded during the past 27 years, there can only be one reason for that lie. Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley. In the final analysis, there is no alternative explanation for that lie because Ken Littleton was a witness for the prosecution, and if Michael Skakel had indeed murdered Martha Moxley as the former tutor would like to suggest, Ken Littleton would have been able to back all the innuendo with facts. Instead, Ken Littleton has stuck to his preposterous alibi, and it is now safe to say that there is one, and only one reason for that. Ken Littleton needs an alibi because he murdered Martha Moxley and Ken Littleton does not have an alibi.
There is nothing implicit about the Moxley murder, the fact that Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley is merely an elaboration of Ken Littleton's inability to adjust to his new surroundings. When Ken Littleton expressed an interest in Martha Moxley, he demonstrated the effort to cope, but he had the capacity of a bipolar disorder and the circumstances that Ken Littleton had to cope with on 30 October 1975 could not have been any less ideal.
Can you imagine the emotional turmoil of an unescorted encounter between Ken Littleton and Martha Moxley? It was clearly a prescription for the tragedy that occurred on October 30, 1975, and that is what makes the claim that Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley so absolutely compelling.
Ken Littleton had great difficulty sorting out Martha's flirtatious behavior with her refusal to be promiscuous, and that created an "explosive" situation. Ken Littleton habituated slowly to the realization that Martha Moxley did not want to have sex with him and his reaction exceeded the usual response, to say the least.
Alana Green captured the essential consequence of Ken Littleton's insanity when she said:
"Ken Littleton reminds me of Lennie Small, in 'Of Mice and Men' and his tragice failure to acheive his dream. I feel sorry for him, it is really a tragic story and John Steinbeck's novel is strikingly familiar. I studied it in school and I still have my heavily underlined copy handy.
For those who are not familiar with the work, it tells the tale of two itinerant farm-workers, George Milton and Lennie Small, and their conversations offer a realistic view of human nature.
For example, when George turned to Lennie and said,
"Books ain't no good. A guy needs somebody-to be near him. A guy goes nuts if he ain't got nobody",
I get a feeling for the picture that Ken Littleton was probably forming when he asked Michael Skakel about Martha Moxley. You have to read Steinbeck's entire novel to appreciate the scope of Lennie's mental illness, and to make a long story short, the tragic Lennie received an invitation to stroke the soft hair of a beautiful, married woman, but he liked it a bit too much. She told him not to mess it up and jerked sideways, at which Lennie, in a panic, grabed on firmly. The woman screamed and Lennie, not wanting his friend George to hear, covered her mouth and nose. As she continued to struggle, Lennie grew angry and ordered her to be quiet, but she was too terrified to stop. Lennie shook her in an effort to subdue her, but broke her neck instead.
When Martha Moxey did not want to go beyond flirting, Ken Littleton punched her in the face and knocked her out. In both instances, the mental illness of Ken Littleton and Lennie Small undermined their capacity to cope with a flirtatious female, and that is evidently a tragedy that is as common in real life, as it is in works of great fiction."
This is the simple truth about Ken Littleton, but eridu and a multitude of Littleton apologists like imho and Pam Knox desperately target anybody who exposes the truth, and the fact that this url is one of their biggest targets, has enhanced the credibility of all the competent, criminal investigator who insist upon the fact that Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley,
www.skakel.shorturl.com
The truth is finally out, and Ken Littleton's desperate apologists, can't do a damned thing about it !
|
alanagreen
Registered User
Posts: 1383
(9/19/02 4:23:59 am)
Reply
|
Suggestion:
You can probably repost this under the title:
"How to frame anybody."
|
yesjames
Registered User
Posts: 2214
(9/19/02 5:45:00 am)
|
Put Ken Littleton on the stand, with or without his medicati
And I can "prove" that Pam Knox murdered Martha Moxley.
|
inmyhumbleopinion
Registered User
Posts: 1851
(9/19/02 5:52:05 am)
ezSupporter
|
Re: Put Ken Littleton on the stand, with or without his medi
yesjamesQuote: Put Ken Littleton on the stand, with or without his medication
And I can "prove" that Pam Knox murdered Martha Moxley.
WOW! Lucianne Goldberg had a goldmine on her hands! Now she can convict Hillary of Vince Foster's murder! Go Ken!
|
yesjames
Registered User
Posts: 2215
(9/19/02 6:16:54 am)
|
Is that your wet dream?
Kind of figures.
|
alanagreen
Registered User
Posts: 1386
(9/19/02 7:33:36 am)
|
Is imho trying to ridicule the implications of the fact ....
Is imho trying to ridicule the implications of the fact
that Mark Fuhrman is currently claiming that Vincent Foster was murdered?
It's 3 strikes and your out, for Mark Fuhrman:
#1 Fuhrman perverted OJ verdict
#2 Fuhrman perverted Skakel verdict
#3 Fuhrman will pervert imho's wet dream
|
yesjames
Registered User
Posts: 2219
(9/19/02 8:34:20 am)
|
Alana, you are right about in imminent third strike !
I went back to the crime thread and dug up this famous, Fuhrman quote:
"If he [Vincent Foster] committed suicide, he didn't do at Fort Marcy Park. If they want it to be a suicide, the people that brought him there and staged the scene are going to have to come forward and state where he was and how he committed suicide. That's never going to happen."
Notice how Fuhrman talks. The people who did this will never come forward, so it is up to a GREAT DETECTIVE like Fuhrman, to pin a face on every unsolved murder.
Still waiting for the first, legitimate conviction...
No doubt, imho is gearing up to "legitimize" strike #3
|
alanagreen
Registered User
Posts: 1387
(9/19/02 10:30:13 am)
Reply
|
Isn't inmyhumbleopinion very clever?
IMHO is trying to ridicule the fact that lunatics routinely use the law to assassinate the character of their enemies.
Doesn't that explain tiger's obsession with what he calls the "legal facts."
To hell with the truth, Michael Skakel is a convicted murderer, and that is all they ever wanted.
|
yesjames
Registered User
Posts: 2739
(10/6/02 8:05:10 am)
Reply
|
Is an Appeal a Demand for Justice?
Campskakel.com offers a message board for Post-trial discussion on the most important legal case of the new century. The entire world is free to talk about the landmark case of CT vs. Michael Skakel, billed as the Kennedy cousin conviction for the murder of Martha Moxley. It is a fascinating message board because it allows what is essentially a world-wide debate, to be settled by ordinary people.
Ordinary people ask all the right questions. Racists and bigots, provide all the wrong answers.
I was surfing the Intenet one day, when I spotted the following, intriguing question on another message board.
"If Ken Littleton is innocent, why does he need immunity?"
Nobody was able to answer the question. And so, I decided to borrow the question and to post it on Campskakel.com. Lo and behold, staunch Kennedy hater, Eridu, answered the question in record time. According to Eridu, Ken Littleton needed immunity;
"Because he testified in front of a grand jury. If they didn't want him to have immunity they would not of had him testify. By testifying in front of the grand jury anybody and everybody that testifies has transactual immunity. Tommy Skakel was not called before the grand jury and thus has no immunity."
Alana Green had an ordinary response to this extraordinary legal maneuver. Fortunately, her immediate response was not burdened by the games lawyers play, to protect guilty clients. She simply said:
"Good Idea. If you are a murderer, testify before the Grand Jury. Nice Trick!"
Eridu didn't waste any time defending Littleton's sweetheart deal and disputing what is now the obvious fact that Ken Littleton murdered Martha Moxley. According to Eridu;
"No trick to it Alanagreen. There is no real evidence again Littleton. Sweeen's crap wouldn't make it into a court room. If you lie to the grand jury you lose your immunity."
Kennedy hater, Eridu, said far too much, without even pausing to blink, to miss all the implications of what is evidently an extremely sophisticated and well organized plot to make it absolutely certain, that this gross miscarriage of justice, CT vs. Michael Skakel, is never reversed.
The absurdity of the manipulative tactic to create the impression that Ken Littleton is a poor, helpless victim, demands a great deal of background manipulation and preparation. Ken Littleton is not a victim. Ken Littleton is the tutor who was responsible for supervising children like Michael Skakel on the day that Martha Moxley was murdered, and he has never been held accountable.
A Grand Jury is a captive audience that is easily manipulated, it is not the key to solving a murder mystery. Kennedy haters may thing that every message board on the Internet is their own, personal Grand Jury, but that is merely the delusion which is responsible for the hostility at campskakel.com. Indeed, campskakel.com is no longer entertaining debate, because all the Kennedy haters go absolutely bananas, when they fail to manipulate this "grand jury message board".
Some of the Kennedy haters who post at campskakel.com pretend to love the Kennedys, to manufacture the appearance that the guilty "Kennedy cousin" verdict is not prejudicial. But these very same people applaud Kennedy haters like Eridu, and despite every effort to disguise their obsession, their extreme prejudices are ultimately exposed through the rigor of the best debate that bigots can possibly offer.
The trademark titles of Eridu's hateful messages defy the adage, "you can't judge a book by its cover." Eridu begins discussion threads and creates hateful titles like "Kennedy's and young girls dying", "Kennedy's that have been charged with rape" and "Kennedy's and drug charges." His cohort, IMHO or inmyhumbleopinion, begins threads with titles like "If Willie Kennedy had just left it in his pants," and their peculiar rants clearly reflect the gossipy nature of all the garbage that Kennedy Haters routinely post, at campskakel.com.
Needless to say, these bigots manifest the "Starr Report" level of justice, where they thrive upon documenting smut, in the hope that they can convert their allegations into politically motivated, criminal charges.
Amazingly, all the obsessive, Kennedy haters who post at campskakel.com are either legally astute, or they are constantly advised by the same posse of lawyers who claimed that Paula Jones was a civil rights activist. Eridu even started a thread titled "The Connecticut Supreme court", and the body of his message was "Denied Michael Skakels bid to get out on bail HA HA HA HA HA..." If Supreme Court Justices do not currently understand the fact that the conviction of Michael Skakel reflects a gross miscarriage of justice, they will clearly understand it when they get a full taste of the grotesque manipulation which is responsible for the conviction of Michael Skakel, and then, the choice will be very clear. They could either uphold the principles and the ideals of American justice, or they continue to keep a man who is clearly not guilty, in prison.
In Eridu's world, justice is about the grotesque manipulation of the American justice system. With people like Lucianne Goldberg, Mark Fuhrman and Eridu working behind-the-scenes, it is not very difficult to appreciate the fact that the conviction of Michael Skakel is a product of American Grotesque. Clearly, the conviction of Michael Skakel has absolutely nothing to do with truth, justice or evidence. The conviction of Michael Skakel is about the manipulation of the legal system in a manner that absolutely guarantees a gross miscarriage of justice. The conviction of Michael Skakel is about the obsession to legitimize the hatred that Eridu routinely manifests. The conviction of Michael Skakel is the product of the fascinating and intriguing interaction between everything and everyone except lady justice. Clearly, it is not even remotely plausible to justify the conviction of Michael Skakel unless you are a bigot or a racist, and in that respect, the conviction of Michael Skakel is very useful because it identifies people who really care about justice and distinguishes them from those who abuse the American legal system.
Campskakel.com has clearly demonstrated the fact that the conviction of Michael Skakel is a product of extreme prejudice and hatred and it is difficult to imagine how an appeal can ever triumph, if we all pretend that extreme hatred and prejudice is not responsible for the conviction of Michael Skakel. If you review the hostile threads at campskakel.com, you will clearly understand the fact that obsessive hatred has denied the opportunity to debate and to reach a verdict which is exclusively guided by the facts which surround the murder of Martha Moxley. In particular, this alibi insults human intelligence so
profoundly, that if we believe in the innocence of Ken Littleton, then OJ Simson did not murder anybody.
According to Ken Littleton:
"My first night at the Skakel house was Oct. 30, 1975. I never met or saw Martha Moxley before Oct. 30, 1975, or after Oct. 30, 1975."
Since 30 October 1975, Ken Littleton’s constant obsession has been to divert attention away from the shocking truth about the murder of Martha Moxley and that has betrayed his guilt even more clearly and even more conclusively than DNA evidence possibly can. Clealy, there is no substitute for human intelligence, and all the hatred and all prejudice in the entire world, will never change that.
www.skakel.shorturl.com
|
|